Hero image

CGR Critical Raw Materials

Lithium

Material criticality in context

Lithium criticality is closely linked to the speed of its uptake. Within a single generation, it has moved from a niche industrial chemical used in ceramics, glass, and greases, to a defining material of electrified transport. This shift has occurred faster than for any comparable industrial metal, fundamentally reshaping its demand base in a relatively short period.68 69 Lithium is also mined solely for its own value, with no meaningful co-product or by-product relationship to other metals, differentiating it from materials like copper and nickel.

What makes lithium particularly difficult to substitute is that it sits at the heart of every lithium-ion cathode chemistry currently in commercial use, crucial for batteries. Battery manufacturers can reduce cobalt intensity through nickel-rich cathodes, or eliminate both nickel and cobalt by shifting to lithium iron phosphate, but all main commercial lithium-ion cathode families still contain lithium. Lithium demand is therefore less exposed than nickel or cobalt demand to changes in the chemistry mix. In the longer term, though, sodium-ion and other non-lithium technologies could displace some lithium demand.70 71

The speed and scale of demand growth are compounded by the geographic concentration of supply. The world’s three largest producing countries account for more than three-quarters of global lithium production.72 Refining introduces a further layer of concentration that extraction figures alone do not capture, since converting lithium into battery-grade chemicals is dominated by a relatively small number of firms and countries.73 In practice, this midstream chemical conversion, rather than mining itself, represents the more immediate supply bottleneck.

An additional dimension of lithium’s criticality stems from the structure of the market. Unlike established exchange-traded metals, lithium does not yet have a single, deeply liquid, and globally accepted price benchmark comparable to those of mature exchange-traded metals.74 75 Price fluctuations are not merely a consequence of tight supply; they also shape future supply. Producers have curtailed output in response to price collapses even while underlying demand has continued to grow, while repeated boom-and-bust investment cycles make it more difficult to plan and finance new production capacity.76

Lithium is also extracted through fundamentally different production routes, each with distinct environmental trade-offs. Hard-rock mining is generally associated with higher energy use and emissions, while brine extraction raises concerns over water consumption and water stress in arid regions.77 78

Material flows and application structure

This Sankey diagram maps how lithium moves from refined chemical through its material streams into applications and final end uses. The diagram is interactive: selecting any stream or application traces the flows connected to it. This is a conceptual visual showing the approximate distribution of lithium across material streams, applications, and end-uses. It shows the structure of the lithium system in 2020, when battery-grade material had already become the dominant application stream but industrial and specialty applications still accounted for a meaningful share of demand. As the midstream analysis demonstrates, this balance shifts substantially over the projection period, with battery applications coming to account for almost the entire system by 2050.

References

  1. 68. International Lithium Association (ILiA). (2025). Lithium 2040: The element shaping our future. Retrieved from: ILiA website
  2. 69. B Jaskula. (2026). U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, February 2026: Lithium. Retrieved from: USGS website
  3. 70. International Lithium Association (ILiA). (2025). Lithium 2040: The element shaping our future. Retrieved from: ILiA website
  4. 71. M Schirber. (2024). Sodium as a Green Substitute for Lithium in Batteries, Physics 17, 73\. Retrieved from: Physics; John-Joseph Marie, Stephen Gifford. (2023). Developments in Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. Faraday Insights, Issue 18: 2023\. Retrieved from: Faraday Insights website
  5. 72. European Commission. (2022). Raw Material Information System: Raw Material Profiles \- Lithium. Retrieved from: RMIS website
  6. 73. IEA. (2022). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. World Energy Outlook Special Report. Retrieved from: IEA website
  7. 74. OECD. (2024) Determining the Price of Minerals: A transfer pricing framework for lithium. Retrieved from: OECD website
  8. 75. IEA. (2025). Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025: Executive summary. Retrieved from: IEA website
  9. 76. Wojewska, A. N., Staritz, C., Tröster, B., & Leisenheimer, L. (2024). The criticality of lithium and the finance-sustainability nexus: Supply-demand perceptions, state policies, production networks, and financial actors. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 101393\. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2023.101393
  10. 77. Brine extraction, historically dominant, involves pumping lithium-rich water into evaporation ponds in arid regions—a process that is highly water-intensive in precisely the places least able to absorb it, and one that has been linked to hydrological disruption and conflict with communities over water access. Hard-rock spodumene extraction, which has expanded rapidly as demand has grown, largely sidesteps the water question but carries a heavier carbon footprint. IEA. (2021). The Role of Critical World Energy Outlook Special Report Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. Retrieved from: IEA website
  11. 78. Wolters, L., & Brusselaers, J. (2024). The Energy Transition Paradox: How Lithium extraction puts pressure on environment, society, and politics. The Extractive Industries and Society, 19, 101498\. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101498

The Circularity Gap Report is an initiative of Circle Economy, an impact organisation dedicated to accelerating the transition to the circular economy.

© 2008 - Present | RSIN 850278983